Parody Videos

THE CHALLENGE

One challenge students may face when creating a tiny house out of popsicle sticks is ensuring structural stability while working with such lightweight and small materials. Popsicle sticks, though sturdy in individual pieces, can easily bend or break if not properly supported. Students will need to carefully plan their designs, considering load distribution and balance to prevent their structures from collapsing. Additionally, creating intricate details like windows, doors, and roofing requires precise measurement and careful gluing, which can be tricky when working with such thin materials. Overcoming these obstacles will require creativity, patience, and strong problem-solving skills.

BEFORE YOU START

WATCH THE SERIES OF PARODY VIDEOS BELOW CREATED BY STUDENTS

STEP 01: DECIDE THE PARODY

Some list of shows to choose from:

YOU ARE NOW READY TO MOVE ONTO STEP 2 BELOW:

STEP 02: SHOT LIST

Download your SHOT LIST from below.

DOWNLOAD SHOT LIST HERE

Fill it in and submit for approval before filming your Parody Video

STEP 03: FILM & EDIT TIME

ADD CONSIDER MAKING A LIST OF JOBS FOR EVERYONE. HAVE A SOLID SHOOTING PLAN IN ORDER TO MAKE THE PRODUCTION MORE EFFECTIVE.

SUBMISSION: READ CAREFULLY

ONLY ONE PERSON SUBMITS THE VIDEO

RUBRIC ATTACHED

Criterion	Excellent (4)	Good (3)	Satisfactory (2)	Needs Improvement (1)
Concept & Creativity	The parody is original, clever, and shows insight into the source material. The twist or humorous angle is strong and engaging.	The parody is creative and generally effective. The twist is somewhat obvious but still entertains.	Some attempt at parody is evident, but the creative angle is weak or underdeveloped.	Little parody effect; concept is vague, confused, or fails to connect to the source material.
Fidelity & Reference to Original	The video clearly references the original show (dialogue, style, character traits, setting) in intelligent ways, while still making it your own.	Many recognizable references to the original are present; some are more superficial, but the connection is solid.	A few references to the original are made, but many parts feel disconnected or generic.	Very few (or no) recognizable references to the original; the video does not convincingly parody the source.
Technical Execution (Video/Audio)	High-quality filming: steady camera work, well-lit scenes, clear audio, good framing, smooth transitions and edits.	Good technical quality, with minor issues (e.g. occasional shaky shots, uneven lighting, or small audio glitches).	Technical issues are noticeable (e.g. grainy video, background noise, awkward cuts) but don’t fully undermine the message.	Poor technical quality: distracting problems in video or audio that significantly detract from the viewer’s experience.
Shot Planning / Adherence to Shot List & Structure	The video closely follows a well-planned shot list; every shot is purposeful. The structure (opening, conflict, resolution etc.) is clear and strong.	Mostly follows the shot list; a few deviations occur but don’t detract too much. The structure is present though some parts may feel weaker.	Some shots do not align with the list, or structure is loose / uneven. The narrative may meander.	Ignores shot list or structure; many shots feel random or incoherent; overall narrative lacks clarity.
Humor, Tone & Engagement	The parody is consistently engaging and funny (or satirical). The tone aligns: the humor, pacing, and delivery are well matched to the target.	Generally humorous and engaging, with a few weaker moments. Tone is mostly consistent.	Some humorous parts work, others don’t. Tone wavers, and engagement drops in places.	Humor is weak, forced, or absent; tone is inconsistent or off; the video fails to engage.